Accessibility statement
Table of Contents
- Accessibility Statement
- Compliance Status
- Test Results
- Inaccessible Content
- Non-compliance
- Establishment of this Accessibility Statement
- Testing Environment
- Tools for Evaluating Accessibility
- Site Pages that Underwent Compliance Verification
- Feedback and Contact
- Recourse Options
RGAA 4.1.2 Accessibility Statement
Olympique de Marseille is committed to making its website accessible in accordance with Article 47 of Law n°2005-102 of February 11, 2005.
To this end, the company implements the following strategy and actions:
- Multi-year accessibility plan 2026-2028: Discover the multi-year plan
- This accessibility statement applies to https://boutique.om.fr/fr/
Compliance Status
boutique.om.fr is in partial compliance with the General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA), version 4, due to the non-compliances listed below.
Test Results
The compliance audit carried out by Agence Aksé reveals that:
- 51.56% of the RGAA version 4 criteria are met
- The average compliance rate of the site is 67.91%
Inaccessible Content
Non-compliance
- Criterion 1.1 – Images – "Does each informative image have a text alternative?" – Transverse
- Criterion 1.2 – Images – "Is each decorative image correctly ignored by assistive technologies?" – Transverse
- Criterion 1.3 – Images – "For each informative image with a text alternative, is this alternative relevant?" – Transverse
- Criterion 1.6 – Images – "Does each informative image have a detailed description, if necessary?" – Transverse
- Criterion 3.1 – Colors – "Information must not be conveyed solely by color." – Transverse
- Criterion 3.2 – Colors – "Is the contrast between text and background sufficiently high?" – Transverse
- Criterion 3.3 – Colors – "Are the colors of interface components sufficiently contrasted?" – Transverse
- Criterion 5.4 – Tables – "Is the title of a table correctly associated?" – Cart
- Criterion 5.7 – Tables – "Are cells correctly associated with their headers?" – Cart
- Criterion 6.1 – Links – "Is each link explicit?" – Homepage, My Account / My Orders
- Criterion 6.2 – Links – "Does each link have a title?" – Homepage, My Account / My Orders
- Criterion 7.1 – Scripts – "Is each script compatible with assistive technologies?" – Transverse
- Criterion 7.3 – Scripts – "Is each script controllable by keyboard and pointing device?" – Transverse
- Criterion 9.1 – Structuring – "Is information structured with appropriate headings?" – Home, Contact, Terms of Use, My Account / My Orders
- Criterion 9.2 – Structuring – "Is the document structure consistent?" – My Account / My Orders
- Criterion 9.3 – Structuring – "Is each list correctly structured?" – Transverse
- Criterion 10.7 – Presentation – "Is the focus visible?" – Home, Contact, Match Kits, Cart
- Criterion 10.8 – Presentation – "Are hidden contents ignored by assistive technologies?" – Transverse
- Criterion 10.13 – Presentation – "Are additional contents on focus/hover controllable?" – Transverse
- Criterion 10.14 – Presentation – "Can CSS-only contents be made visible with the keyboard?" – Transverse
- Criterion 11.1 – Forms – "Does each field have a label?" – Transverse
- Criterion 11.5 – Forms – "Are fields of the same nature grouped?" – Transverse
- Criterion 11.6 – Forms – "Does each grouping have a legend?" – Order
- Criterion 11.10 – Forms – "Is the input control relevant?" – Transverse
- Criterion 11.11 – Forms – "Are errors accompanied by suggestions?" – Transverse
- Criterion 11.13 – Forms – "Does the field's purpose allow auto-filling?" – Transverse
- Criterion 12.1 – Navigation – "Are at least two navigation systems present?" – Transverse
- Criterion 12.6 – Navigation – "Can grouping areas be reached or avoided?" – Transverse
- Criterion 12.11 – Navigation – "Are additional contents on hover/focus keyboard-accessible?" – Transverse
- Criterion 13.8 – Consultation – "Are moving contents controllable?" – Transverse
- Criterion 13.10 – Consultation – "Do complex gestures have a simple alternative?" – Homepage
Establishment of this Accessibility Statement
This statement was established on May 26, 2026.
Testing Environment
Content rendering checks were carried out based on the combination provided by the RGAA 4 reference baseline, with the following versions:
- Browser: Firefox and Chrome
- Assistive technology: NVDA (latest version) and Voiceover
Tools for Evaluating Accessibility
- The code inspector
- Colour Contrast Analyser
- Web Developer Toolbar
- Contrast Finder
Site Pages that Underwent Compliance Verification
P01 - Homepage: https://boutique.om.fr/
P02 - Contact: https://boutique.om.fr/pages/contact
P03 - Terms of Use (Legal Notice): https://boutique.om.fr/pages/conditions-generales-dutilisation
P04 - Match Kits: https://boutique.om.fr/collections/tenues-de-match
P05 - Product: https://boutique.om.fr/products/maillot-om-gardien-bleu-25-26-ome25-mah-r4b
P06 - Cart: https://boutique.om.fr/cart
P07 - Order: https://boutique.om.fr/checkouts/cn/hWNC2cvSntHYT5yZYkrmrXYB/fr-fr
P08 - Search Results: https://boutique.om.fr/search?q=maillot
P09 - Secure Payment: https://boutique.om.fr/pages/paiement
P10 - My Account / My Orders: https://connect-boutique.om.fr/account/orders
Feedback and Contact
If you are unable to access content or a service, you can contact Olympique de Marseille to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another format.
- Send a message via the contact form: https://www.om.fr/fr/contact/form
Recourse Options
This procedure is to be used in the following case.
You have reported an accessibility defect to the website manager that prevents you from accessing content or one of the portal's services, and you have not received a satisfactory response.
- Write a message to the Défenseur des droits (Defender of Rights): https://formulaire.defenseurdesdroits.fr/
- Contact the regional delegate of the Défenseur des droits: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/saisir/delegues
- Send a letter by post (free, no stamp required)
Défenseur des droits
Libre réponse 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07




